Effectiveness and tolerability of nevirapine, stavudine, and lamivudine in clinical practice

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies reveal patients on protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens achieve viral suppression less often in clinical practice than in clinical trials. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) can provide an equally effective and more convenient alternative. Purpose: This retrospective chart review examines the effectiveness, tolerability, and convenience of a nevirapine (NVP), stavudine (d4T), and lamivudine (3TC)-containing regimen in an urban HIV clinical practice. Method: Chart review of patients from September 1996 to April 2000 yielded 73 patients on NVP+d4T+3TC; 83.6% were treatment experienced. Results: By 16 weeks, 86.4% (57/66) had viral loads (VL) <400 in an as-treated (AT) analysis, while 78.1% (57/73) had VL <400 in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. By 24 weeks, 84.6% (33/39) had VL <50 (AT). Beyond 48 weeks, 88.9% (16/18) had VL <50. The mean CD4 increase was 170 cells/mm3. Rash was the most common adverse event (13.7%) in this review. Conclusion: Consistent with other studies, this NVP+d4T+3TC regimen appears effective in both treatment-experienced and -naive patients, regardless of baseline viral loads, in a clinical practice setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yozviak, J. L., Doerfler, R. E., & Woodward, W. C. (2001). Effectiveness and tolerability of nevirapine, stavudine, and lamivudine in clinical practice. HIV Clinical Trials, 2(6), 474–476. https://doi.org/10.1310/T0RR-TGY0-8QWB-8YT2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free