Evidence for synonymy between Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus cinnabarinus (acari, prostigmata, tetranychidae): Review and new data

129Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The species status of Tetranychus cinnabarinus remains uncertain for some acarologists. In the present paper, we propose to examine the taxonomic status of this tetranychid mite through a review of studies that aimed to clarify its taxonomical position. We present and discuss the main results concerning the principal aspects investigated literature published since the description of Boisduval in 1867. These studies concern morphological, biological and molecular data which have been used to separate or to synonymise T. cinnabarinus and Tetranychus urticae. Additional new morphological and biological data are also included. In light of the data presented, the authors conclude that T. cinnabarinus should be considered as a synonym of the polymorphic species T. urticae to which it constitutes the red form. © Auger P. et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Auger, P., Migeon, A., Ueckermann, E. A., Tiedt, L., & Navajas, M. (2013). Evidence for synonymy between Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus cinnabarinus (acari, prostigmata, tetranychidae): Review and new data. Acarologia, 53(4), 383–415. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20132102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free