The risk of cross-infection when marking surgical patients prior to surgery - Review of two types of marking pens

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Two types of marker pens were compared to find whether they produced different risks of infection transmission over different time intervals. Patients and methods: Twenty-four patients were marked according to the type of surgery: each had a set of new dry whiteboard marker (DWM) and a permanent marker (PM) pen. Once used, their tips were used to inoculate blood agar plates at different time intervals. Results: At 0 min, 96% of the DWM pens and 29% of the PM pens were positive of growth. At 3 and 10 min, all of the DWM pens remained positive. The rate dropped to 16.67% in 3 min down to none at 10 min for the PM pens. Conclusions: DWM pens carry a significant risk of transmitting infection between patients. It is recommended that they are not used in marking. PM pens should not be used between patients in less than a 10-min interval.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ballal, M. S. G., Shah, N., Ballal, M., O’Donoghue, M., & Pegg, D. J. (2007, April). The risk of cross-infection when marking surgical patients prior to surgery - Review of two types of marking pens. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X168406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free