Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically “all-in-one” CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and “real-time” CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the “all-in-one” approaches, and Part 2 the “real-time” approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Christodoulou, A. G., Cruz, G., Arami, A., Weingärtner, S., Artico, J., Peters, D., & Seiberlich, N. (2024, June 1). The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1). Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100997
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.