The changing role of metrics in research institute evaluations undertaken by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)

Abstract

As an efficient S&T management tool, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) institute evaluations have experienced four major systems in which quantitative indicators have played a great role. To better understand the roles of quantitative indicators in CAS institute evaluations and institute development, this article aims to discuss the history and development of the CAS institute evaluation systems. It is concluded that institute evaluation has played a significant role not only in promoting scientific progress but also in guiding the direction and focus of the institutes’ development, thereby aligning it with the CAS’s strategy at different phases. Our intention is that this article offers useful insights for a wide scientific community into CAS’ attitudes on the application of metrics in research institute evaluations. This article is published as part of a collection on the future of research assessment.