Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin- cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Three-year results

Abstract

Background: A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study 111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen as the new 'standard,' a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial. Methods: This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG 111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3- hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan-Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The overall clinical response rate was 59% in the paclitaxel group and 45% in the cyclophosphamide group; the complete clinical remission rates were 41% and 27%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P = .01 for both). At a median follow-up of 38.5 months and despite a high rate of crossover (48%) from the cyclophosphamide arm to the paclitaxel arm at first detection of progression of disease, a longer progression-free survival (log-rank P = .0005; median of 15.5 months versus 11.5 months) and a longer overall survival (log-rank P = .0016; median of 35.6 months versus 25.8 months) were seen in the paclitaxel regimen compared with the cyclophosphamide regimen. Conclusions: There is strong and confirmatory evidence from two large randomized phase III trials to support paclitaxel-cisplatin as the new standard regimen for treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.