The Asymmetrical Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan

  • Abu-Serdaneh J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study investigates whether different types of cost accounts are sticky or anti-sticky cost behavior using all listed Jordanian manufacturing companies during the period 2008-2012. Also, the study examines the effect of some explanatory factors on cost stickiness. These factors are asset intensity, debt intensity, free cash flow and growth. The study finds anti-sticky cost behavior for cost of goods sold, and selling expenses, while the cost behavior for SG&A and Administration costs is found to be symmetric, exhibiting neither stickiness nor anti-stickiness. The CGS model shows higher degree of stickiness for companies that have higher asset intensity, and less degree of stickiness for free cash flow. Also, less degree of stickiness is found for growth in the GDP declining period (pessimistic period) as in the case of Jordan. On the other hand, selling expenses model shows higher degree of stickiness for free cash flow and a less degree of stickiness is found for debt intensity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abu-Serdaneh, J. (2014). The Asymmetrical Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n8p113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free