Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease: Is pharmacological prevention of cardiovascular risk cost-effective?

20Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with an increased risk of early death in cardiovascular (CV) disease. The majority of PAD subjects are asymptomatic with a prevalence of 11 per cent among the elderly. Long-term drug prevention aiming to minimize disease progression and CV events in these subjects is probably beneficial, but expensive. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological risk reduction in subclinical PAD. Long-term costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated by employing a decision-analytic model for ACE-inhibitor, statin, aspirin and non-aspirin anti-platelet therapy. Rates of CV events without treatment were derived from epidemiological studies and event rate reduction were retrieved from clinical trials. Costs and health-related quality of life estimates were obtained from published sources. All four drugs reduced CV events. Using ACE-inhibition resulted in a heart rate (HR) of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55–0.79), statins 0.74 (0.70–0.79), and clopidogrel 0.72 (0.43–1.00). Aspirin had a HR of 0.87 and the 95% CI passed included one (0.72–1.03). ACE-inhibition was associated with the largest reduction in events leading to the highest gain in QALYs (7.95). Furthermore, ACE-inhibitors were associated with the lowest mean cost €40.556. In conclusion, while all drugs reduced CV events, ACE-inhibition was the most cost-effective. These results suggest that we should consider efforts to identify patients with asymptomatic PAD and, when identified, offer ACE-inhibition. © 2011, European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sigvant, B., Henriksson, M., Lundin, F., & Wahlberg, E. (2011). Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease: Is pharmacological prevention of cardiovascular risk cost-effective? European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 18(2), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826710389368

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free