The Oura Ring Versus Medical-Grade Sleep Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity of the Oura Ring (OR; Oura Health Ltd.) in measuring sleep parameters compared to medical-grade sleep studies including polysomnography (PSG) or actigraphy (ACT). Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. Review Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated sleep parameters measured simultaneously by the OR and PSG or ACT. Outcomes assessed included Total Sleep Time (TST), Sleep Efficiency (SE), Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO), Sleep Onset Latency (SOL), Light Sleep Time (LST), Deep Sleep Time (DST), and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep time. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. A P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, S., Ibrahim, A. F., Vasudevan, S. S., Quatela, O. E., Nanu, D. P., & Carr, M. M. (2025, October 1). The Oura Ring Versus Medical-Grade Sleep Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OTO Open. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free