Negative recognition: Master and slave in the workplace

25Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The publications of Taylor (1994) and Honneth (1995) have ignited a renewed interest in the Hegelian theme of recognition. But recognition has not only positive aspects, as there are also negative connotations to recognition seen as misrecognition. What might be termed negative recognition argues that there is more to recognition than simple misrecognition. This article aims to show that negative recognition reaches beyond misrecognition and non-recognition. The paper argues that there are at least four versions of negative recognition. These are misrecognition, non-recognition, de-recognition, and pathological mass-recognition. The examples used to illustrate the existence of these four forms of negative recognition have been drawn from the world of work and general politics. The conclusion enhances the negative side of the ‘recognition thesis’ as recently outlined by Martineau et al. (2012) and others. © 2015, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klikauer, T. (2016). Negative recognition: Master and slave in the workplace. Thesis Eleven, 132(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513615619498

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free