Abstract
Subgroup analysis is an integral part of access and reimbursement dossiers, in particular health technology assessment (HTA), and their HTA recommendations are often limited to subpopulations. HTA recommendations for subpopulations are not always clear and without controversies. In this paper, we review several HTA guidelines regarding subgroup analyses. We describe good statistical principles for subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support HTAs and include case examples where HTA recommendations were given to subpopulations only. Unlike regulatory submissions, pharmaceutical statisticians in most companies have had limited involvement in the planning, design and preparation of HTA/payers submissions. We hope to change this by highlighting how pharmaceutical statisticians should contribute to payers' submissions. This includes early engagement in reimbursement strategy discussions to influence the design, analysis and interpretation of phase III randomized clinical trials as well as meta-analyses/network meta-analyses. The focus on this paper is on subgroup analyses relating to clinical effectiveness as we believe this is the first key step of statistical involvement and influence in the preparation of HTA and reimbursement submissions. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Paget, M. A., Chuang-Stein, C., Fletcher, C., & Reid, C. (2011). Subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support health technology assessments. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10(6), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.531
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.