Time in therapeutic range and disease outcomes in elderly Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

7Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The relationship between warfarin treatment quality and prognosis for Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has not been studied thoroughly. Methods and Results: Data from the J-RHYTHM Registry were used to determine the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time in elderly patients (≥70 years). Target INR was 1.6–2.6. Of 7,406 patients with NVAF in the database, 3,832 elderly patients (mean [±SD] age 77.0±5.0 years) constituted the study group. Of these patients, 459 did not receive warfarin and 3,373 received warfarin. Patients on warfarin were subdivided into 4 TTR groups: <40%, 40–59.9%, 60–79.9%, and ≥80%. During the 2-year follow-up, the incidence of thromboembolism and all-cause death was lower in patients with higher TTR (Ptrend<0.001); however, the incidence of major hemorrhage was higher in patients with TTR <40%. In multivariate analysis, compared with the no-warfarin group, TTR 60–79.9% and ≥80% were associated with lower thromboembolic risk, with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17–0.67; P=0.002) and 0.35 (95% CI 0.18–0.68; P=0.002), respectively, and lower all-cause death (HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.22–0.65; P<0.001] and 0.43 [95% CI 0.26–0.71; P=0.001], respectively). TTR <40% was associated with major hemorrhage (HR 5.57; 95% CI 2.04–15.25; P=0.001). Conclusions: In elderly Japanese patients with NVAF, TTR should be maintained ≥60% to prevent thromboembolism and all-cause death. TTR <40% should be avoided to prevent major hemorrhage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Inoue, H., Kodani, E., Atarashi, H., Okumura, K., Yamashita, T., Okuyama, Y., & Origasa, H. (2018). Time in therapeutic range and disease outcomes in elderly Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation Journal, 82(10), 2510–2517. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free