Evaluation of stallion sperm motility with ImageJ using a cell phone camera and a light microscope

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the accuracy of assessing stallion sperm motility using a light microscope, a cell phone camera, and a free computer-assisted semen analysis (FCASA) package for ImageJ. The total motility of frozen (n=22) and cooled (n=48) equine semen was determined by FCASA and compared to the results of subjective visual analysis (SVA) by two technicians. Frozen samples were also evaluated by a commercial computer-assisted semen analysis (CCASA) system. The Friedman test revealed no significant differences (P<0.05) between cooled samples analyzed by FCASA (38.0) and SVA (technician 1, 40.0; technician 2, 40.0), nor between frozen samples analyzed by FCASA (23.36 ± 15.9), SVA (25.5 ± 18.8 and 25.8 ± 18.5), and CCASA (25.2 ± 18.3). However, mean FCASA results were underestimated by 7.2% compared with CCASA. The correlation between FCASA and CCASA was significant and strong (P < 0.0001, r=0.95). Chi-squared tests indicated that FCASA provided similar results (P=0.14) to the reference method (CCASA), but SVA had lower accuracy (P=0.04). ImageJ analysis of cell phone videos captured under a light microscope can be used for estimation of stallion sperm motility with comparable accuracy to commercial systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freitag, G. P., Lima, L. G. F., Kozicki, L. E., Felicio, L. C. S., & Weiss, R. R. (2020). Evaluation of stallion sperm motility with ImageJ using a cell phone camera and a light microscope. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 72(6), 2007–2016. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-11934

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free