Microservice Security Metrics for Secure Communication, Identity Management, and Observability

13Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Microservice architectures are increasingly being used to develop application systems. Despite many guidelines and best practices being published, architecting microservice systems for security is challenging. Reasons are the size and complexity of microservice systems, their polyglot nature, and the demand for the continuous evolution of these systems. In this context, to manually validate that security architecture tactics are employed as intended throughout the system is a time-consuming and error-prone task. In this article, we present an approach to avoid such manual validation before each continuous evolution step in a microservice system, which we demonstrate using three widely used categories of security tactics: secure communication, identity management, and observability. Our approach is based on a review of existing security guidelines, the gray literature, and the scientific literature, from which we derived Architectural Design Decisions (ADDs) with the found security tactics as decision options. In our approach, we propose novel detectors to detect these decision options automatically and formally defined metrics to measure the conformance of a system to the different options of the ADDs. We apply the approach to a case study data set of 10 open source microservice systems, plus another 20 variants of these systems, for which we manually inspected the source code for security tactics. We demonstrate and assess the validity and appropriateness of our metrics by performing an assessment of their conformance to the ADDs in our systems' dataset through statistical methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zdun, U., Queval, P. J., Simhandl, G., Scandariato, R., Chakravarty, S., Jelic, M., & Jovanovic, A. (2023). Microservice Security Metrics for Secure Communication, Identity Management, and Observability. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3532183

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free