Abstract
Seventy patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups in order to compare the effectiveness of various caudal agents in the control of postoperative pain. Four groups were given a caudal injection of either 2% lignocaine, 0.5 bupivacaine, 2% lignocaine + morphine sulphate 4 mg or normal saline + morphine sulphate 4 mg, while the fifth (control) group did not receive an injection. The number of patients requiring postoperative opiates was significantly higher in the lignocaine group than in the morphine (p<0.05) and morphine-lignocaine (p<0.05) groups. No agent significantly reduced the number requiring opiates. In those who received opiates, the mean analgesic period was 228 minutes in the control group, and was significantly longer following bupivacaine (577 min, p<0.01), morphine-lignocaine (637 min, p<0.05) and morphine (665 min, p<0.01). The mean analgesic period following lignocaine (349 min) was not significantly different from control. The incidence of catheterisation was lowest in those patients who did not receive caudal analgesia.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pybus, D. A., D’Bras, B. E., Goulding, G., Liberman, H., & Torda, T. A. (1983). Postoperative analgesia for haemorrhoid surgery. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 11(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x8301100106
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.