Determinants of survival in patients with calciphylaxis: A multivariate analysis

68Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Our study aims to assess the factors affecting survival in patients with calciphylaxis. Methods: We identified 26 patients with biopsy-proven calciphylaxis treated between 1995 and 2007. Clinical and follow-up data were obtained from medical records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the factors affecting survival. Results: The study group consisted of 23 women and 3 men with a mean age of 56.4 ± 12.9 years. All patients had multiple comorbidities/risk factors including coronary artery disease (58%), diabetes mellitus (58%), and peripheral vascular disease (23%). Mean laboratory values were: calcium, 9.0 mg/dL (range, 6.8-11.6); albumin, 2.8 mg/dL; phosphate, 4.5 mg/dL (range, 2.5-7.5); Ca*phosphate, 35.9; and parathyroid hormone, 320.9 pg/mL (range, 4.6-2,419). Parathyroidectomy was performed in 9 of 26 patients (35%). Of our patients, 19% underwent revascularization procedures and 58% underwent debridement. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with poor survival were female gender ( P = .01), increased weight ( P = .01), and need for vascular procedures ( P = .06). Improved survival was associated with operative debridement ( P = .01). Parathyroidectomy alone did not emerge as a determinant of patient survival, although there was a trend to improved survival when debridement and parathyroidectomy were combined ( P = .09). Conclusion: Rather than a single intervention such as parathyroidectomy, a multidisciplinary approach involving early diagnosis, aggressive medical management, operative debridement, and parathyroidectomy may improve survival in calciphylaxis. © 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lal, G., Nowell, A. G., Liao, J., Sugg, S. L., Weigel, R. J., & Howe, J. R. (2009). Determinants of survival in patients with calciphylaxis: A multivariate analysis. Surgery, 146(6), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free