Errors in structural biology are not the exception

16Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the structural biology community swung into action quickly and efficiently, and many urgent questions were solved by macromolecular structure determination. The Coronavirus Structural Task Force evaluated all structures from SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2, but errors in measurement, data processing and modelling are present beyond these structures and throughout the structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. Identifying them is only the first step; in order to minimize the impact that errors have in structural biology, error culture needs to change. It should be emphasized that the atomic model which is published is an interpretation of the measurement. Furthermore, risks should be minimized by addressing issues early and by investigating the source of a given problem, so that it may be avoided in the future. If we as a community can do this, it will greatly benefit experimental structural biologists as well as downstream users who are using structural models to deduce new biological and medical answers in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, Y., Thorn, V., & Thorn, A. (2023). Errors in structural biology are not the exception. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology, 79(Pt 3), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798322011901

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free