Efficiency and fairness of system-optimal routing with user constraints

43Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We study the route-guidance system proposed by Jahn, Möhring, Schulz, and Stier-Moses [Operations Research 53 (2005), 600-616] from a theoretical perspective. As system-optimal guidance is known to be problematic, this approach computes a traffic pattern that minimizes the total travel time subject to user constraints. These constraints are designed to ensure that routes suggested to users are not much longer than shortest paths for the prevailing network conditions. To calibrate the system, a certain measure-called normal length - must be selected. We show that when this length is defined as the travel time at equilibrium, the resulting traffic assignment is provably efficient and close to fair. To measure efficiency, we compare the output to the best solution without guidance and to user equilibria. To measure unfairness, we compare travel times of different users, and show that they do not differ too much. Inefficient or unfair traffic assignments cause users to travel too long or discourage people from accepting the system; either consequence would jeopardize the potential impact of a route-guidance system. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schulz, A. S., & Stier-Moses, N. E. (2006). Efficiency and fairness of system-optimal routing with user constraints. Networks, 48(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.20133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free