Abstract
We randomly administered cephalosporins or macrolides to 365 pediatric patients with influenza-like symptoms and compared the clinical course and complication rate of pneumonia. One hundred and fifty-four patients received cephalosporins (Group 1) and 211 received macrolides (Group 2). There were no significant differences in age, male/female ratio and body weight between the two groups. Macrolides alleviated fever significantly faster than cephalospoins (3.8 ± 1.4 days vs 4.3 ± 1.4 days), though maximum body temperature showed no significant-difference between the two groups. Thirty-nine patients underwent laboratory examinations and twenty-nine had high influenza A (H3N2) virus haemagglutinate inhibition (HI) titer, six had high influenza B (B1) virus HI titer and four did not show any elevation of influenza virus HI titer. Thirteen patients in Group 1 and two patients in Group 2 suffered from pneumonia and the complication rate was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (8.4% vs 0.9%). All of them recovered within two weeks and did not have any other complications. Conclusion: Macrolides are more effective in reducing the rime required to alleviate fever and complication rate of pneumonia than cepharosporines in children with influenza and influenza-like illness. These results indicate that macrolides may have therapeutic value for influenza virus infection.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ninomiya, K., Fukui, T., Imai, T., Matsui, M., & Matsuoka, K. (2002). Effect of maclorides on duration and resolution of symptoms and complication of pneumonia in children with influenza. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 69(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.69.53
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.