Second and third line treatment options for Helicobacter pylori eradication

34Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is a highly successful bacterium with a high global prevalence and the infection carries significant disease burden. It is also becoming increasingly difficult to eradicate and the main reason for this is growing primary antibiotic resistance rates in a world where antibiotics are frequently prescribed and readily available. Despite knowing much more about the bacterium since its discovery, such as its genomic makeup and pathogenesis, we have seen declining treatment success. Therefore, clinicians today must be prepared to face one, two or even multiple treatment failures, and should be equipped with sufficient knowledge to decide on the appropriate salvage therapy when this happens. This article discusses the factors contributing to treatment failure and reviews the second and thirdline treatment strategies that have been investigated. Established empiric second line treatment options include both bismuth based quadruple therapy and levofloxacin based triple therapy. Antibiotic testing is recommended prior to initiating third line treatment. In the event that antibiotic susceptibility testing is unavailable, third line treatment options include rifabutin, rifaximin and sitafloxacin based therapies. © 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, M., & Ang, T. L. (2014). Second and third line treatment options for Helicobacter pylori eradication. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 20(6), 1517–1528. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1517

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free