Isotopic Equilibrium Between Precipitation and Water Vapor in Northern Patagonia and Its Consequences on δ18Ocellulose Estimate

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Modeling work of the isotopic composition of tree ring cellulose (δ18Ocell) relies on the isotopic equilibrium assumption between atmospheric water vapor and tree source water, frequently assimilated to integrated precipitation. Here, we explore the veracity of this assumption based on observations collected during a field campaign in Río Negro province (Argentina) in February–March 2017. We examine how the observed isotopic composition of water vapor deviates from equilibrium with precipitation. This deviation, named isotopic disequilibrium (Δ18Ovap_eq), is low (between −2.0‰ and 4.1‰) and a significant relationship is observed between the isotopic composition of water vapor and its expected value at equilibrium. Negative Δ18Ovap_eq can be explained by evaporation of small raindrops (from 1% to 5% of initial droplet mass). Positive Δ18Ovap_eq can result from vegetation transpiration with transpired water accounting for 14% to 29% to ambient water vapor. The low Δ18Ovap_eq at the study site may be due to the high level of relative humidity (from 70% to 96%) favoring isotopic diffusive exchanges between the two water phases and thus promoting the isotopic equilibrium. We examine the impact of the isotopic equilibrium assumption on the calculation of δ18Ocell. A perfect agreement is shown between observed and calculated δ18Ocell provided that the isotopic composition of source water is significantly higher than the expected averaged isotopic composition of precipitation over the tree growing period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penchenat, T., Vimeux, F., Daux, V., Cattani, O., Viale, M., Villalba, R., … Outrequin, C. (2020). Isotopic Equilibrium Between Precipitation and Water Vapor in Northern Patagonia and Its Consequences on δ18Ocellulose Estimate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 125(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free