Who Stands to Blame? Digital Platforms as Enablers of Insidious Acts

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Understand how digital platforms can be used to render insidious acts, and what roles each actor plays within such ecosystem. Methods: We conducted a non-participant observation of 32 videos and thousands of comments on the YouTube platform on the context of digital predation of minors. Data were codified through thematic analysis. Results: We ended up unraveling six major enablers — i.e., (1) frailty, (2) bur-dening, (3) ineffective oversight, (4) unaccountability, (5) sense of impunity, and (6) digital naivety, at three levels: organizational, institutional, and individual. Conclusions: This research complements the theory of the digital platforms ecosystem by framing the ‘dark’ side of interactions and illustrating six building blocks that surround the insidious acts occurring within social media platforms. The proposed framework helps us understand how each of these actors facilitates the occurrence of insidious acts through the so-called enablers. Practical and social contributions were also provided.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freischlag, B. L. A., & Bittencourt, B. A. (2024). Who Stands to Blame? Digital Platforms as Enablers of Insidious Acts. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2024230124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free