Abstract
We compare the performance of two procedures used for the evaluation of uncertainty of derivatives computed from a polynomial fitted to experimental data. These procedures agree with international recommendations and they are valid independently of the experimental technique used to obtain the data. The first procedure involves performing a least-squares polynomial adjustment under uncertainty. The second procedure is based on Monte Carlo techniques. Both are computer-assisted. As an example, we evaluated the standard uncertainty associated with the gradient of a surface fitted to experimental data that formed a set of points in a three-dimensional space. We found that both methods render very similar results. © 2005 BIPM and IOP Publishing Ltd.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cordero, R. R., & Roth, P. (2005). On two methods to evaluate the uncertainty of derivatives calculated from polynomials fitted to experimental data. Metrologia, 42(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/42/1/005
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.