Potential prescribing issues among older HIV-infected subjects in a Mediterranean cohort: Does the current prevalence give cause for concern?

15Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To determine the prevalence of potential prescribing issues (PPI) in HIV-infected subjects aged ≥65 years according to the Beers and STOPP/START criteria and antiretroviral drug–drug interactions (Liverpool website). Secondary objectives were to assess the concordance between Beers and STOPP/START criteria in our population, and to identify the drugs most frequently involved in PPI. Methods: Cross-sectional cohort study based on a systematic review of the electronic drug prescriptions confirmed by an interview of 91 HIV-infected patients aged ≥65 years. Discrepancies between prescription criteria were assessed using crosstabs and compared using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results: The mean age was 72.1 (5.6) years, 75.8% had ≥3 comorbidities and 59.3% polypharmacy. PPI were identified in 87.9%: 71.4% by STOPP/START and 45.1% by Beers. Comparing both criteria, 56.9% of PPI by STOPP/START were detected by Beers, while 92.5% of those detected by the Beers criteria were detected by STOPP/START (P 30%). Cobicistat was the drug most frequently involved in potential interactions (42.2%). Conclusion: The prevalence of PPI among older HIV-infected persons gives cause for concern, as it is almost 90%. Optimization strategies, including a critical review of the treatment plan, should be implemented in clinical routine by a multidisciplinary team, in particular in patients with multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy. The STOPP/START criteria seem to detect more PPI, mainly for European populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loste, C., Moltó, J., Pérez-Álvarez, N., Puig, J., Echeverría, P., Bonjoch, A., … Negredo, E. (2021). Potential prescribing issues among older HIV-infected subjects in a Mediterranean cohort: Does the current prevalence give cause for concern? British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 87(3), 1310–1317. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free