A method for assessing Emergency Department performance using patient outcomes

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the rates of correct patient disposition after an ED evaluation. Methods: In a university pediatric hospital, a 25% random sample of ED patients for 4 consecutive months was reviewed, after exclusion of minor injuries and patients triaged to the non-urgent clinic. Patients were categorized into one of 4 outcomes on the basis of inpatient resource use: appropriate admission, inappropriate admission, appropriate release, or inappropriate release. A 10% random sample of released patients was contacted by telephone to detect patients who sought care elsewhere after ED release. Results: 642 of 2,682 ED patients (23.9%) were admitted; 159 (24.7%) were inappropriately admitted, and 26 (1.3%) were inappropriately released. The correct identification of the need for hospitalization (sensitivity) was 94.9%, and for release (specificity) 92.7%. Overall, the correct classification rate was 93.1%. Inappropriate admissions were associated with diagnoses of trauma, seizures, and burns. Conclusion: Inappropriate admissions occur at a substantial rate and occur more commonly than inappropriate releases. The correct disposition of patients is a practical and meaningful outcome-based measure of the quality of ED care. This methodology is suitable for use in other EDs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chamberlain, J. M., & Pollack, M. M. (1998). A method for assessing Emergency Department performance using patient outcomes. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5(10), 986–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02777.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free