From deserving victims to 'masters of confusion': Redefining refugees in the 1990s

68Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Immigration, crime, and social welfare are generally regarded as separate issues, both by government officials and by scholars. We show in this article that much is gained by studying the ways in which these dimensions of governance, at the levels of both government and populist fears, come together, intermixing and constituting new 'hybrid' objects that can be used in govern a number of fields. Fears about 'welfare fraud,' about 'bogus refugees,' and about racialized crime - fears which on their own had considerable power - merged together in the mid-1990s in a way that had particularly dire effects on Toronto's Somali community. We here analyze both the general, national features of the panics and concerns in question, and the ways in which they affected this particular community, seeking thereby to call for increased attention to hybrid governance - the ways in which, for example, immigration policy is increasingly being governed through crime.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pratt, A., & Valverde, M. (2002). From deserving victims to “masters of confusion”: Redefining refugees in the 1990s. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(2), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341708

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free