Financial motivation models for community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

3Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are key players in providing primary healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. However, their absence from the formal health system in many of these countries often presents a challenge to their remuneration. The objective of this scoping review is to document programs implemented at both small and large scales in low- and middle-income countries, the remuneration strategies they have established, and the effects of these strategies on the work of CHWs. In total, we included 50 articles in this review. We have identified four types of compensation: fixed compensation, performance-based compensation, compensation based on income-generating activities (IGAs), and combined compensation. We identified the strengths and weaknesses of each type of compensation. A common strength for most models was improvement in motivation and performance. A common weakness for most models was irregular payments. The results of this review highlight the need to consider the economic, social, and cultural settings of the countries or environments at hand, and to include CHWs in discussions regarding the selection of a compensation model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samb, O. M., Niang, M., Gelinas, E., Diouf, N. T., Agbadje, T. T., & El Haouly, A. (2025). Financial motivation models for community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Global Health Action. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2480412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free