Fostering critical thinking in science education: Exploring effective pedagogical models

4Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the digital age, accessing information has both advantages and disadvantages. It is crucial to analyze available data before making decisions. Critical thinking (CT) skills are vital in mitigating the negative impacts of misleading information. This was exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused emotional distress in society and other harmful effects. Educators should aim to develop CT skills in students from a young age, incorporating them into various subjects, including science education. This research aims to investigate trends in CT research over the past decade, identify instructional models that facilitate CT, and evaluate the efficacy of these models in enhancing CT abilities. The search focused on research articles on CT in science education at the K-12 level. The PRISMA model was followed, and the Science Direct, Taylor and Francis, Springer, Wiley Online Library, and ERIC databases were utilized. The results suggest a significant increase in research related to CT over the past decade. Eighteen articles that met our established criteria were identified and included. These findings demonstrate that STEM, inquiry-based learning, problem-based learning, cooperative learning, and predict-observe-explain (POE) instructional models are suitable for fostering CT. These models exhibit characteristics that promote the development of CT skills in the learning process. However, when selecting the most appropriate instructional model, it is important to consider learning objectives, subject matter, student characteristics, and contextual elements within the learning environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sujatmika, S., Masykuri, M., Prayitno, B. A., & Sutarno, S. (2024). Fostering critical thinking in science education: Exploring effective pedagogical models. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(7), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.07.016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free