Evaluation of school-based prevention program in Turkey: Results of a 24-month study

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: In this paper, cavity experiences of children with different levels of eruption and cavity activities that are enrolled at an elementary school with semi-rural characteristics in Kirikkale Provincial center were monitored for 2 years after a variety of protective applications. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and twenty-two children at the age of 7-11 were included in this study. Children were grouped as follows according to their cavity experiences and applications done: Group 1 - control group (with or without cavities) - was given hygiene training only; Group 2 - with medium level cavity activity (2-4 cavities in average) - oral hygiene training + surface restoration applied; Group 3 - children with 2-4 cavities on average - oral hygiene training + professional flour gel applied; Group 4 - children with 2-4 cavities in average - oral hygiene training + flour gel applied with brush; Group 5 - children with extreme cavity activity (children with 5 or more cavities) - oral hygiene training + surface restoration + professional flour gel combination applied. Results: At the end of the 2nd year, 277 children were reached. The increase of number of cavities in permanent teeth was determined as 35%, 0%, 1%, 0%, and 7% in groups 1-5, respectively. The difference between groups was found to be significant (Chi-square analysis, Pearson Chi-square = 27.002, P < 0.01). Conclusion: These findings have showed that, in Kirikkale Provincial center, some cavity-preventive measures such as surface restoration and gel applications, along with hygiene training, could provide optimum protection for school-age children.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dulgergil, C. T., Ercan, E., & Colak, H. (2016). Evaluation of school-based prevention program in Turkey: Results of a 24-month study. European Journal of Dentistry, 10(2), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.178312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free