Pediatric Palliative Care During End of Life: A Privilege of a Few in a Tertiary Referral Hospital From Colombia

4Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: We aim to describe the access to palliative care (PC) in hospitalized children during end-of-life care and compare the circumstances surrounding the deaths of hospitalized children as a basis for implementing a pediatric PC program at our institution. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of deceased pediatric patients at a tertiary referral hospital in Colombia. The study group was selected by randomly drawing a sample of 100 observations from the 737 deceased children from 2013 to 2016. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching was performed to compare the characteristics and outcomes between PC and non-PC treated patients. Results: We included 87 patients. After PS matching, we found that patients under the care of non-PC physicians were more likely to die in the pediatric intensive care unit (non-PC: 6/10 vs PC: 1/10; P =.02), to be on vasopressor agents and mechanical ventilation (non-PC: 7/10 vs PC: 1/10; P =.02), and to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the end of life (non-PC: 5/10 vs PC: 0/10; P =.03). In contrast, a significantly higher proportion of patients under the care of the pediatric PC team died with comfort measures (non-PC: 2/10 vs 8/10; P =.02) and nonescalation of care in physician orders (non-PC: 5/10 vs PC: 10/10; 0.03). Conclusion: In this study, only 10 of 87 patients were treated by the pediatric PC team at the end of life. The latter finding is concerning and is a call to action to improve access to pediatric PC at our institution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cuervo-Suarez, M. I., Claros-Hulbert, A., Manzano-Nunez, R., Muñoz, M., & García, X. (2020). Pediatric Palliative Care During End of Life: A Privilege of a Few in a Tertiary Referral Hospital From Colombia. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 37(8), 636–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909120920542

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free