Risk factors for liver-related mortality of patients with hepatitis C virus after sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral agents

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with liver-related and non-liver-related mortality of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) after sustained virologic response (SVR) to direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of HCV patients cured by DAAs. Results: A total of 330 patients with SVR to DAAs were eligible. The median follow-up period was 3.38 years (inter-quartile range: 2.03–4.58). The cumulative liver-related or non-liver-related mortality rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.00 or 1.29%, 2.87 or 3.60%, and 5.10 or 9.46, respectively. Among the liver-related deaths, 9 of the 10 were from liver cancer. Among the non-liver-related deaths, the most common cause was malignancy. Through multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model, diabetes mellitus (DM, hazard ratio 13.1, 95% confidence interval 2.81–61.3) and a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 12.8, 2.76–59.2), independently predicted liver-related death. No variables were associated with non-liver-related death. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DM and a history of HCC are risk factors for liver-related mortality of HCV patients cured by DAAs. These results indicate that early management of HCV and HCC surveillance of diabetic patients after SVR are important to increase the chance of survival. Further studies are needed to confirm the association of DM and HCC history with survival.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hattori, N., Ikeda, H., Watanabe, T., Satta, Y., Ehira, T., Suzuki, T., … Tateishi, K. (2022). Risk factors for liver-related mortality of patients with hepatitis C virus after sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral agents. JGH Open, 6(10), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12805

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free