Clinical utility of quantitative CT analysis for fissure completeness in bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: Comparison between CT and Chartis™

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The absence of collateral ventilation (CV) is crucial for effective bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with an endobronchial valve. Here, we assessed whether CT can predict the Chartis™ results. Materials and Methods: This study included 69 patients (mean age: 70.9 ± 6.6 years; 66 [95.7%] males) who had undergone CT to assess BLVR eligibility. The Chartis™ system (Pulmonox Inc.) was used to check CV. Experienced thoracic radiologists independently determined the completeness of fissures on volumetric CT images. Results: The comparison between the visual and quantitative analyses revealed that 5% defect criterion showed good agreement. The Chartis™ assessment was performed for 129 lobes; 11 (19.6%) of 56 lobes with complete fissures on CT showed positive CV, while this rate was significantly higher (40 of 49 lobes, i.e., 81.6%) for lobes with incomplete fissures. The size of the fissure defect did not affect the rate of CV. Of the patients who underwent BLVR, 22 of 24 patients (91.7%) with complete fissures and three of four patients with incomplete fissures (75%) achieved target lobe volume reduction (TLVR). Conclusion: The quantitative analysis of fissure shows that incomplete fissures increased the probability of CV on Chartis™, while the defect size did not affect the overall rates. TLVR could be achieved even in some patients with relatively large fissure defect, if they showed negative CV on Chartis™.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S. W., Shin, S. Y., Park, T. S., Choi, Y. Y., Park, J. C., Park, J., … Lee, S. M. (2019). Clinical utility of quantitative CT analysis for fissure completeness in bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: Comparison between CT and ChartisTM. Korean Journal of Radiology, 20(7), 1216–1225. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0724

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free