Inductive time-space lower bounds for sat and related problems

15Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We improve upon indirect diagonalization arguments for lower bounds on explicit problems within the polynomial hierarchy. Our contributions are summarized as follows. 1. We present a technique that uniformly improves upon most known nonlinear time lower bounds for nondeterminism and alternating computation, on both subpolynomial (n o(1)) space RAMs and sequential one-tape machines with random access to the input. We obtain improved lower bounds for Boolean satisfiability (SAT), as well as all NP-complete problems that have efficient reductions from SAT, and Σ k -SAT, for constant k 2. For example, SAT cannot be solved by random access machines using n√3 time and subpolynomial space. 2. We show how indirect diagonalization leads to time-space lower bounds for computation with bounded nondeterminism. For both the random access and multitape Turing machine models, we prove that for all k ≥ 1, there is a constant c k > 1 such that linear time with n 1/k nondeterministic bits is not contained in deterministic ncktime with subpolynomial space. This is used to prove that satisfiability of Boolean circuits with n inputs and n k size cannot be solved by deterministic multitape Turing machines running in n k-ck time and subpolynomial space. © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, R. (2006). Inductive time-space lower bounds for sat and related problems. In Computational Complexity (Vol. 15, pp. 433–470). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-007-0221-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free