Intellectual disability literacy and its connection to stigma: A multinational comparison study in three European countries

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Article 8 of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities requires governments around the globe to raise awareness on issues of disability in their societies, com-batting stereotypes, prejudices and harmful practices. Little comparative data is available on lay people’s social representations of intellectual disability and associated stigma, which could inform actions in line with the convention. The present study compared intellectual disability literacy and stigma among adults in the general population in the UK, Austria and Germany (N = 1046), and examined the effects of providing an intellectual disability label on these outcomes. Although participants came from highly developed European countries and prior contact with people with intellectual disabilities was common, the findings pointed to some striking differences between countries. Participants in Austria and Germany were much less likely than those in the UK to identify symptoms of a possible intellectual disability in an unlabelled vignette. They were also much more hostile towards social contact, a difference that was maintained when participants were informed of the intellectual disability label. Labelling showed controversial effects on stigma, both in its effects on social distance and on beliefs about suitable causes and interventions. Overall, the social acceptance of people with intellectual disabilities appears to be much less advanced in Austria and Germany than in the UK, and awareness of intellectual disability much lower, indicating a need for action at societal level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeilinger, E. L., Stiehl, K. A. M., Bagnall, H., & Scior, K. (2020). Intellectual disability literacy and its connection to stigma: A multinational comparison study in three European countries. PLoS ONE, 15(10 October). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239936

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free