Current Practices and Challenges in Method Validation

3Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Method validation is a cornerstone on which biomarker development and utilization rest. However, given the abundance of biomarker candidates that are being identified and characterized, validation of these entities for the use in nonclinical studies can be complex. The objective of this continuing education course was to review current practices and challenges encountered during the validation of methods for the analysis of novel biomarkers. Additionally, the importance of biological validation and correlation with pathology end points for biomarker candidates was discussed. This article is a summary of the materials presented at the 36th Annual Symposium of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology for a continuing education course titled “Current Practices and Challenges in Method Validation.” The speakers were subject-matter experts in the validation of quantitative mass spectrometry, multiplex binding assays, biological biomarkers, and immunophenotyping and anatomic and clinical pathology considerations in biomarker qualification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poitout, F., Colangelo, J. L., Lavallée, S., Aulbach, A. D., Piché, M. S., Ennulat, D., … Boone, L. I. (2018). Current Practices and Challenges in Method Validation. Toxicologic Pathology, 46(7), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318801571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free