Protracted bacterial bronchitis: bronchial aspirate versus bronchoalveolar lavage findings: A single-centre retrospective study

10Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Retrospective chart review of 133 children who underwent bronchoscopy because of possible protracted bacterial bronchitis to compare the results of bronchial aspirates with those of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). When comparing BAL and bronchial aspirate in 70 patients where both samples were available, the result was comparable in 46 cases (65%). If only bronchial aspirates would have been available, seven patients (10%) would have been overtreated, four children (6%) undertreated and three (4%) would have received a different treatment. Although, BAL and bronchial aspirate are comparable in the majority of cases, differences exist with an impact on treatment decision, underlying the uncertainties in the pathophysiology of protracted bacterial bronchitis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verhulst, S., Boel, L., & Van Hoorenbeeck, K. (2019). Protracted bacterial bronchitis: bronchial aspirate versus bronchoalveolar lavage findings: A single-centre retrospective study. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free