Lack of quantitative training among early-career ecologists: A survey of the problemand potential solutions

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Proficiency in mathematics and statistics is essential to modern ecological science, yet few studies have assessed the level of quantitative training received by ecologists. To do so, we conducted an online survey. The 937 respondents were mostly early-career scientists who studied biology as undergraduates. We found a clear self-perceived lack of quantitative training: 75% were not satisfied with their understanding of mathematical models; 75% felt that the level of mathematics was "too low" in their ecology classes; 90% wanted more mathematics classes for ecologists; and 95% more statistics classes. Respondents thought that 30% of classes in ecology-related degrees should be focused on quantitative disciplines, which is likely higher than for most existing programs. The main suggestion to improve quantitative training was to relate theoretical and statistical modeling to applied ecological problems. Improving quantitative training will require dedicated, quantitative classes for ecology-related degrees that contain good mathematical and statistical practice.© 2014 Barraquand et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barraquand, F., Ezard, T. H. G., Jørgensen, P. S., Zimmerman, N., Chamberlain, S., Salguero-Ǵomez, R., … Poisot, T. (2014). Lack of quantitative training among early-career ecologists: A survey of the problemand potential solutions. PeerJ, 2014(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free