Meta-analysis of comparing part-solid and pure-solid tumors in patients with clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer in the eighth edition TNM classification

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the prognoses between part-solid and puresolid tumors for clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the eighth edition TNM classification. Methods: We searched the literature in PubMed and Web of Science for all eligible articles published before November 31, 2018. The pooled data included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratio (HR) of OS (pure-solid/part-solid) was used as the measure of differential effects. Pure-solid or partsolid tumors in all studies included were matched according to the solid component size or according to the eighth edition TNM classification. Results: Seven studies including 2,037 patients with c-stage IA NSCLC were pooled in the meta-analysis. Patients with pure-solid tumors had significantly poorer OS (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.21?2.35, P=0.002), DFS (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51, P=0.006) and RFS (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.08-2.80, P=0.020). In subgroup analyses, when the meta-analysis was limited to T1a-1b (≥2 cm) lung cancer, the prognosis for pure-solid tumors was inferior to that for part-solid tumors regarding both OS and RFS. In adenocarcinoma subgroup, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of OS and RFS, but we detected a meaningful difference in DFS. Conclusion: Part-solid tumors may have a better prognosis than pure-solid tumors in clinical stage IA patients according to the eighth edition TNM classification, and similar results were found for the T1a-1b (≥2 cm) subgroup. There were no substantial differences in OS and RFS between two groups in lung adenocarcinoma. However, we detected a meaningful difference in DFS, which might also suggest a superior prognosis for partsolid tumors. We propose that the part-solid and pure-solid tumors in the same T component category be considered separately.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, T., Li, M., Lin, M., Zhao, M., Zhan, C., & Feng, M. (2019). Meta-analysis of comparing part-solid and pure-solid tumors in patients with clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer in the eighth edition TNM classification. Cancer Management and Research, 11, 2951–2961. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S196613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free