Skip to content

Emotional Arousal Predicts Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


Do judges telegraph their preferences during oral arguments? Using the U.S. Supreme Court as our example, we demonstrate that Justices implicitly reveal their leanings during oral arguments, even before arguments and deliberations have concluded. Specifically, we extract the emotional content of over 3,000 hours of audio recordings spanning 30 years of oral arguments before the Court. We then use the level of emotional arousal, as measured by vocal pitch, in each of the Justices' voices during these arguments to accurately predict many of their eventual votes on these cases. Our approach yields predictions that are statistically and practically significant and robust to including a range of controls; in turn, this suggests that subconscious vocal inflections carry information that legal, political, and textual information do not.

Author supplied keywords




Dietrich, B. J., Enos, R. D., & Sen, M. (2019). Emotional Arousal Predicts Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis, 27(2), 237–243.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free