Stereoselective inhibition of human butyrylcholinesterase by phosphonothiolate analogs of (+)- and (-)-cocaine

15Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The hydrolysis of cocaine (benzoylecgonine methyl ester) to ecgonine methyl ester by human butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE; EC 3.1.1.8) has been shown previously to constitute an important means to detoxicate this material to pharmacologically inactive metabolites. The naturally occurring (-)-cocaine is hydrolyzed to ecgonine methyl ester approximately 2000 times slower than the unnatural (+)-cocaine isomer. In good agreement with previous studies, (-) cocaine bound to human BuChE with relatively good affinity and competitively inhibited the hydrolysis of the spectrophotometric substrate butyrylthiocholine with a K(i) value of 8.0 μM. Similarly, (+)-cocaine also showed relatively high affinity for the human BuChE and competitively inhibited butyrylthiocholine hydrolysis with a K(i) value of 5.4 μM. The phosphonothiolates corresponding to the transition state analogs for both (-)- and (+) cocaine hydrolysis were synthesized and tested as inhibitors of human BuChE-catalyzed hydrolysis of butyrylthiocholine. The phosphonothiolate corresponding to the transition state for (-) cocaine hydrolysis was a competitive inhibitor with a K(i) value of 55.8 μM. The phosphonothiolate corresponding to the transition state for (+)-cocaine hydrolysis gave a K(i) value of 25.9 μM, but, in addition, it also showed irreversible inhibition with a it, of inactivation of 68.8 min-1 M-1. It is likely that the mechanism-based inhibitor described herein may find use as a mechanistic probe of butyrylcholinesterase action and also possibly aid in the purification of this class of esterases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berkman, C. E., Underiner, G. E., & Cashman, J. R. (1997). Stereoselective inhibition of human butyrylcholinesterase by phosphonothiolate analogs of (+)- and (-)-cocaine. Biochemical Pharmacology, 54(11), 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00403-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free