Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Two Prestressed Girder Bridges

  • Aghagholizadeh M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Copyright © 2019, arXiv, All rights reserved. A comparative analysis of two bridges constructed with the most commonly used girder types in Florida is carried out. The girder types that the bridges are employed for this study are AASHTO Type III (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) and Florida I-Beam. Two bridges that have exactly the same specifications but with different girder type are analyzed under baseline state and different prestress loss cases. Finite element models of these bridges are utilized and the FE models are subjected to two types of virtual load tests of Florida legal loads namely C5 and SU4. Florida I-Beam tends to have higher load carrying capacity, higher lateral stiffness, cost efficiency and better element level reliability when compared to AASHTO Type girders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aghagholizadeh, M. (2019). Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Two Prestressed Girder Bridges. Current Trends in Civil & Structural Engineering, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.33552/ctcse.2019.03.000572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free