EXPLORING HEALTH AND DESIGN EVIDENCE PRACTICES IN EHEALTH SYSTEMS' DEVELOPMENT

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Evidence-based practices play an essential role in the development of eHealth systems. Prior research has investigated the challenge of shared understanding between professionals from the fields of health sciences and design and has highlighted the need for effective alignment of development and research practices in eHealth. However, there is a limited understanding of epistemological differences between these fields and how professionals conceptualise evidence. In this paper, we investigate how healthcare and design professionals think about evidence and how they implement evidence practices in their work. We interviewed eight professionals and used reflexive thematic analysis to identify the challenges and strategies associated with their evidence practices. Our results identify five shared evidence practices between healthcare and design professionals: stakeholder-driven, process-driven, problem-driven, effect-driven, and solution-driven. These five evidence practices indicate opportunities for closer alignment of development and research practices among healthcare and design professionals and offer a basis to create a shared understanding of evidence between both fields.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morales Ornelas, H. C., Kleinsmann, M., & Kortuem, G. (2023). EXPLORING HEALTH AND DESIGN EVIDENCE PRACTICES IN EHEALTH SYSTEMS’ DEVELOPMENT. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 3, pp. 1795–1804). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free