Abstract
Objective: The study aims to assess interrater reliability of the revised Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) system. Three OPD axes were included in the reliability analysis: the Levels of Structural Integration Axis (OPD-LSIA), the Conflict Axis (OPD-CA), and the Interpersonal Relations Axis (OPD-IRA). Methods: A heterogeneous sample of n = 80 patients was diagnostically assessed with SCID-I and SCID-II as well as with an OPD interview. Two raters of a group of five independently rated each patient’s OPD interview according to OPD-3. Results: Interrater reliability was good to excellent for OPD-LSIA [ICC1,1 =.874 -.920], and moderate to good for OPD-CA [ICC1,1 =.547 -.764] as well as for OPD-IRA at the aggregated level of Agency and Communion [ICC1,1 =.575 -.793], except for raters’ self-perceived tendencies to act towards the patient. Conclusion: The revised OPD-3 can be used as a reliable instrument for a psychodynamic diagnosis of conflicts, levels of structural integration, and dysfunctional relationship patterns.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lackmann, V., Sell, C., Henkel, M., Kozik, C., & Benecke, C. (2023). Interrater Reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3). Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie, 69(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2023.69.oa2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.