Interrater Reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3)

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to assess interrater reliability of the revised Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) system. Three OPD axes were included in the reliability analysis: the Levels of Structural Integration Axis (OPD-LSIA), the Conflict Axis (OPD-CA), and the Interpersonal Relations Axis (OPD-IRA). Methods: A heterogeneous sample of n = 80 patients was diagnostically assessed with SCID-I and SCID-II as well as with an OPD interview. Two raters of a group of five independently rated each patient’s OPD interview according to OPD-3. Results: Interrater reliability was good to excellent for OPD-LSIA [ICC1,1 =.874 -.920], and moderate to good for OPD-CA [ICC1,1 =.547 -.764] as well as for OPD-IRA at the aggregated level of Agency and Communion [ICC1,1 =.575 -.793], except for raters’ self-perceived tendencies to act towards the patient. Conclusion: The revised OPD-3 can be used as a reliable instrument for a psychodynamic diagnosis of conflicts, levels of structural integration, and dysfunctional relationship patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lackmann, V., Sell, C., Henkel, M., Kozik, C., & Benecke, C. (2023). Interrater Reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3). Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie, 69(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2023.69.oa2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free