Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art

32Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the past, the practice of symptom validity assessment (SVA) in European countries was considerably lagging behind developments in North America, with the topic of malingering being largely taboo for psychological and medical professionals. This was being changed in the course of the past decade with a growing interest in methods for the assessment of negative response bias. European estimates of suboptimal test performance in civil and social forensic contexts point at base rates similar to those obtained in North America. Symptom over-reporting and underperformance in neuropsychological examinations appear to occur in a sizable proportion of patients. Although there is considerable progress in establishing SVA as an integral and indispensable part of psychological and neuropsychological assessment in some countries, others appear to lag behind. In some countries there is still enormous resistance against SVA from part of the neuropsychological and psychiatric communities. © 2013 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Schmand, B. A., Santamaría, P., & González-Ordi, H. (2013). Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art. Clinica y Salud, 24(3), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl2013a14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free