Hormonal receptors in mammary carcinoma: comparison between quantitative and qualitative methods.

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Alternatives to the traditional hormone receptor dosages for prognostic evaluation and clinical approach to breast cancer have been proposed for immunohistochemical determinations. For correlation purposes, such procedures were compared in 37 patients presenting 5 to 15 years of survival. Considering 30 fm/mg as the positivity index, the disagreement between both methods reached 35.1% with estrogen and 48.5% with progesterone receptors. When the positiveness level was changed to 20 fm/mg, the discrepancies were reduced to 32% with ER and increased to 57% with PgR. This study leads us to not recommend the immunohistochemical method applied to paraffin sections as an alternative procedure to the dextran-charcoal dosage for prognosis and therapeutic management of mammary carcinoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montoro, A. F., Giannotti Filho, O., Monteiro, D. M., Montoro, F. F., Pinho, M. A., & Figueiredo, M. T. (1997). Hormonal receptors in mammary carcinoma: comparison between quantitative and qualitative methods. São Paulo Medical Journal = Revista Paulista de Medicina, 115(4), 1471–1474. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801997000400004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free