Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Using Artificial Intelligence Tools as Second Reviewers for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Performance Comparison of Two AI Tools Against Human Reviewers

  • Helms Andersen T
  • Marcussen T
  • Termannsen A
  • et al.
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods (2025) 3(4)
DOI: 10.1002/cesm.70036
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

What This Study Is About This study tested if AI tools (Elicit and ChatGPT) could help speed up systematic reviews by pulling out important information from research papers, potentially replacing one of the two human reviewers usually needed. AI tools are software applications that use artificial intelligence algorithms to perform tasks that require human intelligence. What They Did What They Found What This Means

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helms Andersen, T., Marcussen, T. M., Termannsen, A. D., Lawaetz, T. W. H., & Nørgaard, O. (2025). Using Artificial Intelligence Tools as Second Reviewers for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Performance Comparison of Two AI Tools Against Human Reviewers. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free