Meta-Analysis on the Association between Echo Intensity, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function in Older Individuals

13Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The use of ultrasonographic echo intensity (EI) to evaluate skeletal muscle quality and its effects on strength, explosive power, and physical function (PF) in older individuals re-mains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the associations among EI, muscle strength (MS), and PF in older individuals. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SPORT Discus, and CINAHL databases through October 2022 to identify primary studies examining the association between EI and MS/PF. Effect sizes were computed using a random-effects model and presented using forest plots. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and I2 statistics were used to measure heterogeneity. Results: This meta-analysis included 24 patients. EI demonstrated a negative association with maximal strength (r=-0.351; 95% confidence inter-val [CI],-0.411 to-0.288; p<0.001) and explosive power (r=-0.342; 95% CI,-0.517 to-0.139; p=0.001) in older individuals. Handgrip strength also showed a significant negative correlation with EI (r=-0.361; 95% CI,-0.463 to-0.249; p<0.001). However, we observed only a small and non-significant negative association between EI and gait speed (r=-0.003; 95% CI,-0.083 to-0.077; p=0.943), and a weak non-significant correlation with the chair stand test (r=0.072; 95% CI,-0.045 to 0.187; p=0.227). Conclusion: Increased EI was associated with lower strength and power but not with gait speed or chair test performance in older individuals. Further large-sam-ple studies with long-term follow-up are needed to improve frailty prediction and risk assessment in this population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yuan, H., & Kim, M. (2023). Meta-Analysis on the Association between Echo Intensity, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function in Older Individuals. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 27(4), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free