Ethics of Controlled Human Infection Studies With Hepatitis C Virus

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Global elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) will be difficult to attain without an effective HCV vaccine. Controlled human infection (CHI) studies with HCV were not considered until recently, when highly effective treatment became available. However, now that successful treatment of a deliberate HCV infection is feasible, it is imperative to evaluate the ethics of establishing a program of HCV CHI research. Here, we evaluate the ethics of studies to develop an HCV CHI model in light of 10 ethical considerations: sufficient social value, reasonable risk–benefit profile, suitable site selection, fair participant selection, robust informed consent, proportionate compensation or payment, context-specific stakeholder engagement, fair and open collaboration, independent review and oversight, and integrated ethics research. We conclude that it can be ethically acceptable to develop an HCV CHI model. Indeed, when done appropriately, developing a model should be a priority on the path toward global elimination of HCV.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rid, A., Feld, J. J., Liang, T. J., & Weijer, C. (2023). Ethics of Controlled Human Infection Studies With Hepatitis C Virus. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 77, S216–S223. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free