Ankle arthrodesis: A comparison of anterior approach and transfibular approach

32Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological results of arthrodesis performed by the anterior approach and by the transfibular approach in ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: Sixty patients underwent open arthrodesis (38 by the anterior approach and 22 by the transfibular approach). The visual analogue scale score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were examined clinically, and radiological examination was performed on the alignment of the lower extremity and bone union. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in AOFAS score (from 39.8 to 58.3 in the anterior approach group and from 44.5 to 60.7 in the transfibular approach group). There was no significant difference in AOFAS score at the last follow-up in both groups. The time to fusion was 13.5 weeks in the anterior approach group and 11.8 weeks in the transfibular approach group. Nonunion occurred in four cases in the anterior approach group and in one case in the transfibular approach group. Conclusions: Ankle arthrodesis by the anterior approach and the transfibular approach showed comparably good clinical results.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. G., Ha, D. J., Gwak, H. C., Kim, C. W., Kim, J. H., Lee, S. J., … Park, J. H. (2018). Ankle arthrodesis: A comparison of anterior approach and transfibular approach. CiOS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 10(3), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.368

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free