Maldi-TOF MS versus 16S rRNA sequencing: Minor discrepancy between tools in identification of bacteroides isolates

15Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Members of the genus Bacteroides are important components of the normal microbiota of gastrointestinal tract; however, as opportunistic pathogens are also associated with severe or even life-threatening infections with significant mortality. Various species within Bacteroides fragilis group are phenotypically very similar; thus, their identifications with traditional-automated biochemical methods are frequently inaccurate. The identification of the newly discovered or reclassified bacteria can be doubtful because of the lack of biochemical profile in the database of these tests. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) method by testing of 400 Hungarian Bacteroides clinical isolates. Inaccurate identification results with MALDI-TOF MS were confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and findings were compared with traditional-automated biochemical test rapid ID 32A method as well.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sárvári, K. P., Soki, J., Iván, M., Miszti, C., Latkoczy, K., Melegh, S., & Urbán, E. (2018). Maldi-TOF MS versus 16S rRNA sequencing: Minor discrepancy between tools in identification of bacteroides isolates. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica, 65(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1556/030.64.2017.025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free